2014 model<\/a> I test drove before. In fact, I liked the look and feel of that version much better. This new design seems over-the-top and the shape of the hatchback results in inefficient cargo space (suitcases still have to be laid flat versus straight up).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Handling and performance are fine. Nothing to complain about but nothing memorable either. Getting from point A to point B was \u201cmeh.\u201d Electricity should last about 53 miles but we only averaged about 40. That means only short trips between charges. Fortunately, this is also a gas hybrid. However, while power is constant and sufficient while driving on electricity only, the car suddenly suffers when the gas engine kicks in. You really feel that 1.5L engine as it chugs along.<\/p>\n
I like the addition of a fifth seat and seatbelt, but the non-existent leg room (due to a middle console that extends all the way through) is pretty sad. Passengers in a full back seat will have to forgo any personal space and parents with two car seats have no hope of fitting anyone else there since the space is very narrow as well.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
2016 Chevy Volt Review \u2014 New Yet Not<\/h3>\n As technology continues to progress, the Chevy Volt now has features such as Lane Keep Assist with Lane Departure Warning, Side Blind Zone Alert with Lane Change Alert, front automatic braking, and advanced park assist (for parallel parking). Being part of the Chevrolet family, the Volt is also equipped with the goodness of OnStar. No earth-shattering new features though.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Back when we reviewed the 2014 model, the funky stretch cover thingy was so weird and cheap-looking that we figure it was a design afterthought. Well, two years later, that same cover is still there. Is it really so hard to have a retractable cover or something else that doesn\u2019t look like a failed 10-minute fix?!<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
2016 Chevy Volt Review \u2014 Back to the Drawing Board<\/h3>\n I really had high hopes for the 2016 Chevy Volt. Frans and I liked driving the Volt before but this model seems like a step back with more fluff and less substance. I hope subsequent releases improve this \u201ccould be great\u201d plug-in hybrid.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Chevy Volt was a decent car but the 2016 Chevrolet Volt seems like something went wrong. See what I mean in this car review of the plug-in hybrid.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":55245,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[102],"tags":[265,119,120,173],"yoast_head":"\n
2016 Chevrolet Volt \u2014 New Is Not Necessarily Better<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n